Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Five pillars
Every check, with its source
Where a check was decided by reading the journal's homepage or its ISSN Portal record, we keep what we read: the page's SHA-256 fingerprint, the time, and the words that decided it.
Identity & governance
5d7be1fc33daa3e9cbee7aa36badfd17d2a9ec2a9df53301027f08c13bac15d4) — looked for the ISSN 1726-4901 — not found7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — “title: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association”7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — “… Association Current Issue: October 2026 - Volume 89 - Issue 10 Editor-in-Chief : Shuu-Jiun Wang ISSN : 1726-4901 Ranking : MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL: 99/336 Frequency : Monthly Online ISSN :…”7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — “… - Volume 89 - Issue 10 Editor-in-Chief : Shuu-Jiun Wang ISSN : 1726-4901 Ranking : MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL: 99/336 Frequency : Monthly Online ISSN : 1728-7731 Impact Factor : 2.3 Subscribe…”7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for an e-mail address, "contact us" or "contact" — not foundEditorial integrity
7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for "peer review", "peer-review", "double blind", "double-blind", "refereed" — not found7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for "publication ethics", "malpractice", "cope", "ethics" — not found7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for "plagiarism", "similarity", "turnitin", "ithenticate" — not found7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — “… & INTERNAL: 99/336Frequency: MonthlyOnline ISSN: 1728-7731Impact Factor: 2.3 SubscribeeTOC Alerts Submit a ManuscriptCurrent Issue HighlightsClaudin 18 is not a biomarker for breast mucinous…”Technical standing
7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for "doi.org/" — not found7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for "/oai" (an OAI-PMH link) and "citation_" (Google Scholar tags) — not foundPreservation & access
7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for a creativecommons.org/licenses link, "CC BY" or "Creative Commons" — not found7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — looked for "article processing charge", "apc", "publication fee", "no fee", "free of charge", "no charges", "no apc" — not found7c609ea78218769140d8b68092e8e326d4358cac387421ea3deb08873cd41075) — “… Asked Questions Visit our Online Support Center Privacy policy Open Access Policy Legal disclaimer Terms and Copyright Manage Cookie Preferences Copyright © 2026 Wolters Kluwer N.V. and/or its…”Reach & citation
History
Every reading of this journal, newest first, with the methodology it was made under (the versions).
| Date | Grade | Score | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026 | E | 37 | 2026.10 |
What this means for you
Not recommended. Critical failures or predatory-style signals. A paper here is unlikely to count for promotion and may not be retrievable in a few years.
11 things the journal should fix. We can send them the list with your name as the requesting author:
Watch this rating
Hear by e-mail and on your dashboard when this journal's grade changes, when its records cannot be read, or when a hijack or clone signal appears. Watched ratings are re-checked at least every 7 days. Free for up to 10 journals.
Sign in to watch this ratingCertificate
A dated one-page certificate of this rating with all sources, for a thesis or promotion file.
Open printable certificate ↗Take it with you
The facts on this page as JSON — the grade, the score, when it was rated and under which methodology, every check with its source and what we read, and the history. Free, no key; any website may read it.
https://scholar.smartscholars.in/check.php?issn=1726-4901&format=json
Show this rating on your site
Paste either piece into your own page — no key, no account, nothing to install. They show the public facts only: the grade, the date it was rated, and a link to every check behind it. When the rating changes, they change.
The badge — a small image that links to this page:
<a href="https://scholar.smartscholars.in/check.php?q=1726-4901" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://scholar.smartscholars.in/badge.php?issn=1726-4901" alt="Journal Trust Rating of Journal of the Chinese Medical Association" height="28"></a>
The card — a box with the grade, the score and the date, for a sidebar or a journal list (see it):
<iframe src="https://scholar.smartscholars.in/embed.php?issn=1726-4901" title="Journal Trust Rating of Journal of the Chinese Medical Association" width="360" height="380" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
Before you submit
Journals now screen submissions for assistant-written text, paper-mill phrases, invented references and reused figures. See the same signals first, with the evidence — the manuscript is read once and discarded.
Manuscript Screen →Are you the editor?
Fix every item above with the Smart Scholars tools — Journal Audit, GetIndexed and DOI Doctor — and the rating updates on the next check: a rating older than 7 days is made again when it is opened, and you can re-check it at once from My journals.
Improve this journal →Three questions, if you run Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Answer what you like; we reply from a person, about this record. Nothing here is shown anywhere.
