Indian Practitioner
Five pillars
Every check, with its source
Where a check was decided by reading the journal's homepage or its ISSN Portal record, we keep what we read: the page's SHA-256 fingerprint, the time, and the words that decided it.
Identity & governance
b7fe7e9e77909e378cea285559cce6bb5c7b9e8e9b83b169bd1da47149cd61e5) — looked for the ISSN 0019-6169 — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — “title: Home - The Indian Practitioner”71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "editorial board", "editorial team", "editor-in-chief", "editor in chief", "advisory board" — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for the ISSN 0019-6169 — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — “… India Phone : 022 46067132 / 022 35115296 Email: theindianpractitioner@gmail.com Website: www.theindianpractitioner.com Medi News 3486 Medi Matters 43 Editorial 40 Articles 39 Current…”Editorial integrity
71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "peer review", "peer-review", "double blind", "double-blind", "refereed" — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "publication ethics", "malpractice", "cope", "ethics" — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "plagiarism", "similarity", "turnitin", "ithenticate" — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for impact-factor badges (SJIF, IIFS, Global Impact Factor, ISRA, Cosmos), "ISI indexed", speed promises ("publish within", "48 hours" …) or a self-declared impact factor — not foundTechnical standing
71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "doi.org/" — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "/oai" (an OAI-PMH link) and "citation_" (Google Scholar tags) — not foundPreservation & access
71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for a creativecommons.org/licenses link, "CC BY" or "Creative Commons" — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "article processing charge", "apc", "publication fee", "no fee", "free of charge", "no charges", "no apc" — not found71c47c02c72d3fd41794fbe056eb89e446742c5ee73e66b90dfa673d200c2f53) — looked for "open access" — not foundReach & citation
History
Every reading of this journal, newest first, with the methodology it was made under (the versions).
| Date | Grade | Score | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026 | E | 22 | 2026.10 |
What this means for you
Not recommended. Critical failures or predatory-style signals. A paper here is unlikely to count for promotion and may not be retrievable in a few years.
13 things the journal should fix. We can send them the list with your name as the requesting author:
Watch this rating
Hear by e-mail and on your dashboard when this journal's grade changes, when its records cannot be read, or when a hijack or clone signal appears. Watched ratings are re-checked at least every 7 days. Free for up to 10 journals.
Sign in to watch this ratingCertificate
A dated one-page certificate of this rating with all sources, for a thesis or promotion file.
Open printable certificate ↗Take it with you
The facts on this page as JSON — the grade, the score, when it was rated and under which methodology, every check with its source and what we read, and the history. Free, no key; any website may read it.
https://scholar.smartscholars.in/check.php?issn=0019-6169&format=json
Risk Radar
The other question — is this journal showing the behaviour that precedes delisting, hijacking or retractions? Fifteen written rules on the public record.
Score this journal →Show this rating on your site
Paste either piece into your own page — no key, no account, nothing to install. They show the public facts only: the grade, the date it was rated, and a link to every check behind it. When the rating changes, they change.
The badge — a small image that links to this page:
<a href="https://scholar.smartscholars.in/check.php?q=0019-6169" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://scholar.smartscholars.in/badge.php?issn=0019-6169" alt="Journal Trust Rating of Indian Practitioner" height="28"></a>
The card — a box with the grade, the score and the date, for a sidebar or a journal list (see it):
<iframe src="https://scholar.smartscholars.in/embed.php?issn=0019-6169" title="Journal Trust Rating of Indian Practitioner" width="360" height="380" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
Before you submit
Journals now screen submissions for assistant-written text, paper-mill phrases, invented references and reused figures. See the same signals first, with the evidence — the manuscript is read once and discarded.
Manuscript Screen →Are you the editor?
Fix every item above with the Smart Scholars tools — Journal Audit, GetIndexed and DOI Doctor — and the rating updates on the next check: a rating older than 7 days is made again when it is opened, and you can re-check it at once from My journals.
Improve this journal →Three questions, if you run Indian Practitioner
Answer what you like; we reply from a person, about this record. Nothing here is shown anywhere.
